Author Archives: basiltsiokos

basiltsiokos's avatar

About basiltsiokos

Basil Tsiokos is a Senior Programmer for the Sundance Film Festival, focusing on nonfiction features. He was most recently with DOC NYC for nearly a decade, where he served as Director of Programming since 2014, and with the Nantucket Film Festival as its Film Program Director. Prior to those positions, Basil was the longtime Artistic and Executive Director of NewFest. He has been affiliated with Sundance since 2005 as a Programming Associate. Basil serves on the feature nominating committees for the International Documentary Association Awards and Cinema Eye Honors. He has written about documentaries daily since 2010 on what (not) to doc. Basil holds a Masters degree from New York University and two undergraduate degrees from Stanford University.

Workshop: Does Your Trailer Work?

On Monday, November 15, together with Trevite Willis, I’ll be leading a workshop for Raindance New York assessing the promotional and fundraising trailers of documentary and narrative filmmakers.

Trevite and I will be reviewing trailers submitted by pre-enrolled class participants in advance and offering our feedback during the class, engaging in a discussion about what aspects did (and didn’t) work and how the trailers can better be developed to represent your goals. Constructive criticism will be sought from other attendees to help strengthen your trailer for promotional or fundraising purposes. We’ll also evaluate trailers received the night of the class, but to guarantee a more involved review, you are encouraged to pre-register by Sunday, November 7th.

Sign up now for Does Your Trailer Work?

1 Comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Recommendations

Dear Documentary Filmmakers: Pop Songs

Dear Documentary Filmmakers: Using a barrage of low-res stills to illustrate pop songs you don’t have the rights to = bad.

The use of music in film is a huge topic – far too huge for a single blog post or for a non-expert like me – but, having encountered the above scenario a few times, it bears some consideration.

There are perfectly valid reasons for why you may want to use recognizable, popular songs in your film, just as there are equally good reasons to forego that route to instead have an original score. I’m not going to argue here why you should take one approach or another, but I will focus on the former and some of the missteps I’ve occasionally observed.

Continue reading →

Leave a comment

Filed under Dear Documentary Filmmakers, Documentary, Film

DOC NYC: Rounding Out the Line-Up

About a month ago, I offered some brief thoughts on the first titles announced in the inaugural DOC NYC line-up. The festival launches this Wednesday, and I’ve been remiss in commenting upon the remainder of the selections announced last month.

There’s been one change in the Viewfinders competition – Toronto International Film Festival title ANPO by Linda Hoaglund has replaced fellow TIFF doc THE SOUND OF MUMBAI, which won’t be screening in the festival after all. My thoughts on ANPO are here.

Continue reading →

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Recommendations

indieWIRE @ Hulu Docs: Election Edition

With the very important midterm elections happening tomorrow, indieWIRE and I have rushed the new edition of our curated Hulu Documentaries page to focus on a number of docs looking at various local and national elections, as well as on political divide in the country.

For more information about the selections, take a look at my iW article.

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Indiewire @ Hulu Docs, Recommendations

Special Panel: State of the Industry at DOC NYC

If you’re based in the NYC area or planning on being in town this coming Wednesday, November 3rd at 4pm, I’ll be moderating the first panel at DOC NYC, New York’s newest doc festival, organized by the creators of Stranger Than Fiction and by the IFC Center.

Entitled “State of the Industry,” the panel is in two parts – the first featuring filmmakers and the second industry representatives – each separately reflecting on the past year in non-fiction filmmaking from more of a business perspective, offering audiences a chance to get their insider’s view.

Best of all, the event is free – but you need a ticket. Read more about the panel and secure your seat here.

1 Comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Recommendations

IFP: More on What (Not) To Do For Film Festivals

The latest post in my contribution to IFP’s “Ask the Expert” blog is up, wrapping up my advice on What (Not) To Do For Film Festivals – covering promo materials and rejection/acceptance letters. Take a look here.

Update: The original post seems to have gone missing from IFP’s site, so I’ve posted the article below.

Dear Filmmakers:

In my last blog post, I took a page out of my own blog and discussed a few things filmmakers should and shouldn’t do when dealing with film festivals. This post continues that general topic, focusing on the submission screener, presskits and promotional materials, and the best (and worst) ways to respond to rejection or acceptance.

During the submission process, most festivals simply want to see your DVD. Many accept EPKs (electronic presskits) during this period as well, but, honestly, no one’s going to look at them unless and until the film is selected for inclusion. Usually, whoever processes the submission takes the screener and puts it one place, and everything else goes somewhere else. Keep this in mind before you start going crazy with your press materials, spending money and time that could be best served making sure your actual film is the best it can be. What this means: unless the festival explicitly asks for any of the following, you do not need to provide glossy presskit folders, posters, printed stills, or printed loglines, synopses, biographies, etc. To be clear – I’m not saying not to have a presskit. You should organize the electronic versions of all of these things and have them ready to email to the festival upon request. Film stills, in particular, are essential – a huge mistake many filmmakers make is not having a stills photographer around during production to take professional quality, high-resolution stills that can later be used to promote the film. Once again, have these available, but don’t worry about sending them in until the festival needs them.

While presskits serve a promotional purpose, it’s best to think of them as helping the festival promote your film to their audience, not helping you promote your film to the programmer. S/he will be judging whether to select the film or not based on the film itself, not on your promotional material. Which brings us to the issue of promotional materials: some filmmakers send the most unnecessary, and sometimes frankly bizarre things, in their submission packages. Programmers have received t-shirts, mugs, food, shot glasses, naked pictures, fast food gift certificates, stuffed animals, underwear, condoms, signed photos of celebrities completely unrelated to the submitted film, etc etc. Filmmakers often feel like this kind of stuff will help their film stand out, make them memorable, or maybe function as a bribe to get their film selected. Personally, I feel this is yet another example of wasted resources that could go toward improving your film. You can feel free to send promo materials, but know this – it will not get your film programmed. If you just want to show your creative marketing, great, but wait until you can use it on the right people – potential audience members – at the right time – after you’ve been selected.

What the festival does need is your screener. My recommendation is to submit artwork-free, label-free DVDs. Beyond the practical (paper labels can cause playback issues), the main reason I say this is that your screener artwork/design can make an unintentional first impression. Better to let things stay neutral and submit a simple DVD-R with the film’s title, your name, running time, and contact information, and whatever else the festival requires. (I go into more detail about this here.)

After you’ve completed your submission, it’s a waiting game. As I noted last time, while some limited communication with the festival is fine for appropriate professional purposes, be sensible. For example, if, since submitting to Festival A, you’ve been selected for Festival B, you should email Festival A to let them know the change to your premiere status – this is courteous and it may be a factor in Festival A’s decision. What’s not sensible? Contacting the festival to ask when they’re going to make their decisions. This info is usually easily available on the fest’s website, and ignoring it makes you a pest.

You’ve waited it out, the decision time has come, and you find out your film has been selected. Congratulations! Recognize that the festival is now dealing with dozens or even hundreds of filmmakers and they’ve anticipated that you have questions. Seasoned fests will have a system in place to provide you with answers – they’ll send out information that you need to read and forms that you need to complete, with deadlines that you need to follow. If, after reading through these, you still have unanswered questions, ask the appropriate person. Notice, I said the appropriate person. The info the fest provides often designates different people who are in charge of discrete areas – print traffickers to deal with your exhibition tape, publicity coordinators to deal with your press questions, hospitality coordinators to deal with your travel, etc. Don’t send the same question to all of these folks. Fest staff members are excited to have you participate in their event and they want to help you – trust that the right person will be able to get to your question and answer it, but have patience and recognize that they are probably receiving inquiries from other filmmakers too.

What happens if your submission unfortunately is not selected? The simplest course of action is to do nothing – accept that, for whatever reason, your film just wasn’t a match for this specific festival’s line-up. Resist the impulse to reply to your rejection notice with a catty comment – your film may not have made it this time, but that doesn’t mean the same programmer might not like your next film. Don’t burn bridges. Know that festivals receive more submissions than they can possibly show. Some are just plain bad, others are bad fits, still others are personally just not to a programmer’s liking, while others are fine or good, but there just aren’t enough slots to accommodate them. Some festivals are able to provide feedback as to why a submission wasn’t selected. Send them a note requesting feedback. Keep in mind that they may not be able to give it to you right this minute, because they have a festival to organize keeping them very busy, but they should be able to respond more fully after their event wraps with at least some general notes. The bottom line: stay professional and don’t take the rejection personally. Every filmmaker has been there.

Leave a comment

Filed under Film, Film Festivals, Recommendations

Dear Documentary Filmmakers: Tributes

Dear Documentary Filmmakers: Is there a story here, or are you just sharing your anecdote-filled tribute to a loved one w me?

While it’s easy to pick up a camera today and start shooting, thanks to the relatively cheap and easy accessibility of video, I can’t stress enough that this alone does not a (good) doc make. Just because you can shoot it, doesn’t mean there’s anything necessarily of substance there, or at least not necessarily something other people will want to see. This isn’t exclusive to the above DDF, but family/friend tributes are a typical subject I’ve encountered many times where this is unfortunately evidenced.

I’m not saying that you shouldn’t make that video honoring your grandma, or record stories about your dad by his old college buddies – of course, make whatever you want to make, and I’m sure your family members are lovely people. You should ask yourself, however, beyond your family and friends, who else would really benefit from seeing it? Is it something that a perfect stranger would be interested in? Does it offer an engaging story, regardless of personal acquaintance with the featured subject?

If it does, great – fine tune it as you would any doc, so it’s potentially presentable as a film and not as a home movie, and consider submitting it to festivals in the hopes of sharing that captivating story (and your fascinating relative’s life) with a larger audience.

If instead your film doesn’t offer an entry point with which outsiders can engage, be realistic about what you have – a surprise that you can present to your loved one at an anniversary or birthday party, perhaps, but definitely not something that you should be sending to programmers.

Leave a comment

Filed under Dear Documentary Filmmakers, Documentary, Film

indieWIRE @ Hulu Docs: Halloween Edition

Following in the steps of last week’s selections, my newly curated Hulu Documentaries page is also inspired by Halloween, and features vampires, horror hosts, holiday fanatics, and underground filmmakers.

For more information about the selections, take a look at my iW article.

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Indiewire @ Hulu Docs, Recommendations

Special Screening: WO AI NI (I LOVE YOU) MOMMY

Coming to NYC’s Stranger Than Fiction next Tuesday, November 2: WO AI NI (I LOVE YOU) MOMMY

I’ve previously written about Stephanie Wang-Breal’s touching documentary debut here.

If you’re in the NYC area, go to STF – and come back to the IFC Center beginning the next day for the inaugural DOC NYC by the same organizers.

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Recommendations

Dear Documentary Filmmakers: Viewer Discretion

Dear Documentary Filmmakers: Viewer discretion advisories are for TV shows. Programmers are adults, you don’t need to warn us.

Within the last year or so, I’ve started to notice that some filmmakers are using viewer discretion advisories at the beginnings of their films – at least for the docs that have crossed my path for various programming or curatorial purposes. I’m not sure if the warnings have ended up staying there or not when the films actually screen publicly, but that’s part of my issue here – it comes down to you as a filmmaker understanding who is watching and judging your film and how you should and should not address them.

Continue reading →

Leave a comment

Filed under Dear Documentary Filmmakers, Documentary, Film