Category Archives: Recommendations

IFP: More on What (Not) To Do For Film Festivals

The latest post in my contribution to IFP’s “Ask the Expert” blog is up, wrapping up my advice on What (Not) To Do For Film Festivals – covering promo materials and rejection/acceptance letters. Take a look here.

Update: The original post seems to have gone missing from IFP’s site, so I’ve posted the article below.

Dear Filmmakers:

In my last blog post, I took a page out of my own blog and discussed a few things filmmakers should and shouldn’t do when dealing with film festivals. This post continues that general topic, focusing on the submission screener, presskits and promotional materials, and the best (and worst) ways to respond to rejection or acceptance.

During the submission process, most festivals simply want to see your DVD. Many accept EPKs (electronic presskits) during this period as well, but, honestly, no one’s going to look at them unless and until the film is selected for inclusion. Usually, whoever processes the submission takes the screener and puts it one place, and everything else goes somewhere else. Keep this in mind before you start going crazy with your press materials, spending money and time that could be best served making sure your actual film is the best it can be. What this means: unless the festival explicitly asks for any of the following, you do not need to provide glossy presskit folders, posters, printed stills, or printed loglines, synopses, biographies, etc. To be clear – I’m not saying not to have a presskit. You should organize the electronic versions of all of these things and have them ready to email to the festival upon request. Film stills, in particular, are essential – a huge mistake many filmmakers make is not having a stills photographer around during production to take professional quality, high-resolution stills that can later be used to promote the film. Once again, have these available, but don’t worry about sending them in until the festival needs them.

While presskits serve a promotional purpose, it’s best to think of them as helping the festival promote your film to their audience, not helping you promote your film to the programmer. S/he will be judging whether to select the film or not based on the film itself, not on your promotional material. Which brings us to the issue of promotional materials: some filmmakers send the most unnecessary, and sometimes frankly bizarre things, in their submission packages. Programmers have received t-shirts, mugs, food, shot glasses, naked pictures, fast food gift certificates, stuffed animals, underwear, condoms, signed photos of celebrities completely unrelated to the submitted film, etc etc. Filmmakers often feel like this kind of stuff will help their film stand out, make them memorable, or maybe function as a bribe to get their film selected. Personally, I feel this is yet another example of wasted resources that could go toward improving your film. You can feel free to send promo materials, but know this – it will not get your film programmed. If you just want to show your creative marketing, great, but wait until you can use it on the right people – potential audience members – at the right time – after you’ve been selected.

What the festival does need is your screener. My recommendation is to submit artwork-free, label-free DVDs. Beyond the practical (paper labels can cause playback issues), the main reason I say this is that your screener artwork/design can make an unintentional first impression. Better to let things stay neutral and submit a simple DVD-R with the film’s title, your name, running time, and contact information, and whatever else the festival requires. (I go into more detail about this here.)

After you’ve completed your submission, it’s a waiting game. As I noted last time, while some limited communication with the festival is fine for appropriate professional purposes, be sensible. For example, if, since submitting to Festival A, you’ve been selected for Festival B, you should email Festival A to let them know the change to your premiere status – this is courteous and it may be a factor in Festival A’s decision. What’s not sensible? Contacting the festival to ask when they’re going to make their decisions. This info is usually easily available on the fest’s website, and ignoring it makes you a pest.

You’ve waited it out, the decision time has come, and you find out your film has been selected. Congratulations! Recognize that the festival is now dealing with dozens or even hundreds of filmmakers and they’ve anticipated that you have questions. Seasoned fests will have a system in place to provide you with answers – they’ll send out information that you need to read and forms that you need to complete, with deadlines that you need to follow. If, after reading through these, you still have unanswered questions, ask the appropriate person. Notice, I said the appropriate person. The info the fest provides often designates different people who are in charge of discrete areas – print traffickers to deal with your exhibition tape, publicity coordinators to deal with your press questions, hospitality coordinators to deal with your travel, etc. Don’t send the same question to all of these folks. Fest staff members are excited to have you participate in their event and they want to help you – trust that the right person will be able to get to your question and answer it, but have patience and recognize that they are probably receiving inquiries from other filmmakers too.

What happens if your submission unfortunately is not selected? The simplest course of action is to do nothing – accept that, for whatever reason, your film just wasn’t a match for this specific festival’s line-up. Resist the impulse to reply to your rejection notice with a catty comment – your film may not have made it this time, but that doesn’t mean the same programmer might not like your next film. Don’t burn bridges. Know that festivals receive more submissions than they can possibly show. Some are just plain bad, others are bad fits, still others are personally just not to a programmer’s liking, while others are fine or good, but there just aren’t enough slots to accommodate them. Some festivals are able to provide feedback as to why a submission wasn’t selected. Send them a note requesting feedback. Keep in mind that they may not be able to give it to you right this minute, because they have a festival to organize keeping them very busy, but they should be able to respond more fully after their event wraps with at least some general notes. The bottom line: stay professional and don’t take the rejection personally. Every filmmaker has been there.

Leave a comment

Filed under Film, Film Festivals, Recommendations

indieWIRE @ Hulu Docs: Halloween Edition

Following in the steps of last week’s selections, my newly curated Hulu Documentaries page is also inspired by Halloween, and features vampires, horror hosts, holiday fanatics, and underground filmmakers.

For more information about the selections, take a look at my iW article.

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Indiewire @ Hulu Docs, Recommendations

Special Screening: WO AI NI (I LOVE YOU) MOMMY

Coming to NYC’s Stranger Than Fiction next Tuesday, November 2: WO AI NI (I LOVE YOU) MOMMY

I’ve previously written about Stephanie Wang-Breal’s touching documentary debut here.

If you’re in the NYC area, go to STF – and come back to the IFC Center beginning the next day for the inaugural DOC NYC by the same organizers.

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Recommendations

indieWIRE @ Hulu Docs: Subcultures

This week, as a soft lead for more Halloween-oriented selections next week, I’ve curated a series of subcultural portraits for Hulu’s Documentaries page for indieWIRE. Focusing on fan culture, music, and unusual vocations and avocations, the six films offer glimpses into the out of the ordinary.

For more information about the selections, take a look at my iW article.

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Indiewire @ Hulu Docs, Recommendations

Special Screenings: THE CANAL STREET MADAM

Coming to NYC’s Stranger Than Fiction next Tuesday, October 19 (and elsewhere the rest of the month – see below): THE CANAL STREET MADAM

Earlier this year, I was pleased to come onboard as a Co-Producer of the feature documentary debut project of my good friend and former NewFest colleague, Cameron Yates. THE CANAL STREET MADAM had its World Premiere in Competition at SXSW, and has also screened at Hot Docs, BAMcinemaFEST, and Provincetown. After a summer hiatus, we’re bringing the film back to festivals this month: in addition to STF’s screening next Tuesday, the team is headed to our subject’s stomping grounds, New Orleans for screenings at NOLA’s own film festival, then onto the Philadelphia Film Festival next week, and caps off this month with our European premiere at the Rome Film Festival.

I’m obviously biased here, but I hope you get a chance to see the film. It tells the story of Jeanette Maier, a former New Orleans madam who ran an infamous brothel alongside her mother, at which her own daughter, Monica, worked. Yates befriended Maier after learning about the FBI raid that shut down her lucrative business serving the political and business elite of not only New Orleans but of other major US cities, and followed her for more than six years as she told her story and found herself developing into a politically aware activist for the decriminalization of prostitution. We’re very proud of the film – check out the trailer on our website, and come to a screening!

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Recommendations

indieWIRE @ Hulu Docs: LGBT Youth & Iraq in Perspective

A new round of my curated selections for Hulu’s Documentaries page for indieWIRE is now up. This week, it gets a little political, with a double bill sadly inspired by the recent spate of LGBT youth suicides (and by yesterday’s National Coming Out Day), and by the technical anniversary of the US’ declaration of war against Iraq.

For more information about the selections, take a look at my iW article.

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Indiewire @ Hulu Docs, Recommendations

On Cable: SINS OF MY FATHER

Coming to HBO this Monday, October 4: SINS OF MY FATHER

Nicolas Entel’s portrait of Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar and his son has been on the festival circuit for the past year, making stops at Mar del Plata and IDFA before coming stateside at this year’s Sundance and winning both the Audience and Jury Award at the Miami Film Festival.

After the death of his father in 1993, Juan Escobar and his mother, Pablo’s widow, went into exile in Argentina, changing their names to avoid being connected to his notoriety. Entel convinces Juan, now known as Sebastián Marroquín, to discuss his father and his legacy for the first time publicly, having experienced a surprisingly different side to the man Colombia viewed as its most wanted criminal. The film effectively shows the personal conflict that the younger Escobar has gone through, paying for his father’s crimes, but seeking reconciliation with his past and expiation of his inherited guilt, culminating in a poignant meeting arranged between the sons of two of his father’s most prominent victims and himself.

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Recommendations, Sundance

indieWIRE @ Hulu Docs: Non-Fiction NYC

For my curation of Hulu’s Documentaries page for indieWIRE this week, I was (loosely) inspired by the currently in-progress New York Film Festival. Rather than highlighting that fest’s alumni, I went broader and selected docs about or featuring NYC. For more information about the selections, take a look at my iW article.

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Indiewire @ Hulu Docs, Recommendations

DOC NYC: Initial Line-Up

The newest documentary festival on the block, Thom Powers and Raphaela Neihausen’s DOC NYC, has announced the first half of its line-up. The pair, who are also behind the Stranger Than Fiction series, have expanded their initial plans for the inaugural event by a couple of days, giving New Yorkers more of a chance to check out their offerings.

Of the 18 titles released today, half just screened earlier this month at Toronto – fittingly, of course, since Powers is that festival’s doc programmer. These include the event’s two Galas, Werner Herzog’s CAVE OF FORGOTTEN DREAMS and Errol Morris’ TABLOID – I’ve seen and enjoyed CAVE and am very much looking forward to TABLOID.

The two competitions – Viewfinders, focused on established and emerging filmmakers, and Metropolis, focused on NYC based films – sound like a diverse group of films. I’ve already written about my admiration for ARMADILLO and SOUND OF MUMBAI, and the other TIFF titles (here and here), but can also highly recommend both KATI WITH AN I and THE DISAPPEARANCE OF MCKINLEY NOLAN.

The first DOC NYC runs November 3-9.

1 Comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Film Festivals, Recommendations

Special Screening: AMERICAN SPLENDOR

Coming to NYC’s Stranger Than Fiction next Tuesday, October 5: AMERICAN SPLENDOR

STF pays tribute to underground comic book artist Harvey Pekar, who died this summer, with a special screening of this narrative/documentary hybrid by Shari Springer Berman and Robert Pulcini, an adaptation of his long-running comic series. Premiering at Sundance in 2003, the film claimed the US Dramatic Grand Jury Prize and went on to screen at scores of additional festivals, winning prizes at Cannes, and numerous guild and critics’ nods after its theatrical release.

Drama/doc hybrids are often awkward creatures – neither fish nor fowl, they at times miss the mark when considered as examples of either form, or emerge as interesting experiments but ultimately unsatisfying. Luckily, however, AMERICAN SPLENDOR just works. It might be because of the nature of the already explicitly autobiographical source material – it’s not a far stretch to accept the real-life Pekar breaking the fourth wall and directly addressing the audience as a narrator or Greek chorus commenting on the sequences enacted by Paul Giamatti. I wouldn’t want to see a lot of imitators attempting to copy this formula though – it does seem very specific to this project, and it does frankly lean more towards narrative than documentary in the end. Still, despite being an unusual choice for STF, it’s definitely an appropriate one, and I’ll be curious to hear how a documentary-specific audience responds to the film in this context.

Leave a comment

Filed under Documentary, Film, Recommendations, Sundance